Art is Evolutionary
Everything is subject to change, well at least that is the common notion. Most things are adapting changes through time, but still there are exceptional ones who have shown resilience to change imposed by time. Moving along, we have the very complex concept commonly known as “art. ” Art had always captured the amazement of humankind throughout history. As a matter of fact, the history of humanity can even be studied by examining the art forms of the different periods in history.
Perhaps it would be helpful to determine whether art could be categorized as evolutionary or was it resilient to adopt changes. This exploration of the topic would be very useful in understanding a very prevalent phenomenon throughout human history, and that phenomenon is known to us as art. This paper would stand beside the argument that art could only be best described by the term “evolutionary. ” As a testament to the evolutionary nature of art, we could take a glance at the list of the many art movements that had sprung out throughout history.
Virtually all the letters of the alphabet have at least one art movement. The immensity of art movements just tells us that as time progresses, people define and approach art differently and accordingly to the traits of the present period. Mary Stokstad, author of “Art History”, herself had said that the “… divisions [in art] are useful as we examine developments in the arts” (Stokstad 3) Out of all the periods in history, the renaissance is perhaps the most significant era for the evolution of art. That is just understandable as the renaissance is described as the “rebirth” of the society.
The renaissance was coined as “rebirth” because the society had managed to retrieve long lost classical ideas. These classical ideas are proven by ancient societies to be essential for improving human living conditions. One of the most important of these classical ideas is the appreciation of art and its incorporation as an integral arm of the society. And during that renaissance, people had seemingly found a new and deeper appreciation for art. Perhaps the most resounding name in the discussion of the renaissance is Leonardo da Vinci.
He is even regarded as the ideal representative of the said era as he is considered as the genuine “renaissance man. ” Da Vinci’s best known work is his rendition of “The Last Supper. ” And just like most of the art works during the renaissance, this particular work is leaning towards realism. (Stokstad 643-648) As history had progressed, came the concept called modern art during 20th century. A good representative of the era would be Pablo Picasso. His works are common regarded as abstract, hence it contradicts the realism that as prevalent in the renaissance period. As a conclusion, art had undeniably changed through time.
It is important that we consider that the concept of art can be roughly condensed that it is about expression. Artists of different time period would certainly have varying views on art. Different time periods would simply mean different context of experiences to artists. Moreover, we humans are known as the specie that had successfully evolved to master our environment. So it would just be logical that art, our means of expression, a product of the humankind’s complexity, would also evolve with us.
Stokstad, Marilyn. Art History. NJ: Prentice Hall PTR. 2007Sample Essay of Paperial.com