How Thinking Goes Wrong
Hume’s maxim consists in the claim that there is no statement that is enough to ascertain a miracle except the same statement is of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavours to establish. According to Hume, apart from true belief, one has to weigh the evidence of our testimony to its reasonability. Hume claims that in doing this, one is to weigh the probable falsehood of the testimony uttered to the fact whether it is reasonable.
Furthermore, there are some problems associated with scientific thinking. Some of these problems are enumerated below. The first is that often times, the theory influences observations. This is best captured in the words of the Physicist, Werner Heisenberg, who said that “what we observe is not nature itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning. ” Another problem associated with scientific thinking is that it is more probable that the person making the observation alters what is observed.
This is because our mere studying a might change its feature. Also, the results we derive from scientific methods are dependent on the equipments used. For instance, the size of the equipment used might likely give different results. The quote by Arthur Schopenhauer is not entirely true. For not all truths are ridiculed and opposed. Some truths may be ignored but ignoring a truth does not imply opposing it. His quote is more or less rigid in nature.Sample Essay of PapersOwl.com