Psychosexual Development and Contemporary Society
Sigmund Freud’s theory, such as his theory on the psychosexual development of human beings, remains applicable in today’s culture. For the most part, Freud’s concept of the stages of human development in terms of their erogenous zones and how failure to advance from any of these stages can constitute future disorders on the person’s psychological health and behavior.
In these times when people have become very much engrossed over the idea of preserving their health by turning to alternative lifestyles, there is reason to believe that Freud’s theory can at least help explain why certain behaviors exist and why, if the aim is to understand the psychological processes behind the same behaviors, embracing an alternative lifestyle will not necessarily provide insight into our personal problems.
Freud posits that the genital stage, which is one of the stages of psychosexual development, allows people to have symbolic gratifications such as the creation of love relationships and the formation of families (Grunbaum, 1983, p. 6). The failure to advance from this stage, therefore, may constitute the failure to establish for one’s self the most basic social institution there is, which is the family.
The issue of whether or not an individual is able to found or retain a family has persisted through ages and remains a relevant issue today, especially at a time when marriage divorces and legal separations come about like ordinary circumstances that need no further analysis. Apparently, the presumption—that marriages ending in divorces and legal separations need no further analysis—is mistaken.
Nothing could be more relevant than the issues surrounding marriage for the patent reason that a society established on a collective body of dysfunctional families is a society that is always on the brink of imploding from its own weight of problems. These problems arise primarily from the deficiencies of marriage, even the lack thereof. Reference Grunbaum, Adolf. “Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science. ” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 57. 1 (1983): 5-31.Sample Essay of RushEssay.com