Infrastructure and public Works — both in the public sector and those that are made by private sectors — are important factors especially in the economic improvement and development of a country for a region. However, the existence of government and the additional factor in variable of scarcity provides an avenue for decision-making and excretion especially in construction. Allowing a society to continuously undergo construction and infrastructure projects without the associated planning and objective process might even be detrimental to the economic short and long run.
Such evidence is presented especially in the cases of historic London where public works and infrastructure projects, although beneficial for some sectors and collective action groups in society, created a negative effect to the overall general welfare of the future population especially in the control of infrastructure that address issues of garbage and disease control (Greenhalgh 2009).
Because of the absence of a planning process for the London city proper, many of the cisterns and required sewer systems and the city were not anymore able to fit into the city planning region and as a result was costly to society not only in the monetary costs that were required to get rid of such garbage but also in the health and the city’s population (Mackenbach 2007).
Recognizing this, modern government agencies such as the United Kingdom Institute planning agencies that serve to restrain property and construction while maintaining the overall goal of adjusting such plans and permits to the short and long-term plans of the city (KAMBITES & OWEN 2006). This does not only serve as a method for beautification and preservation of the environment of the location, as some critics have claimed, but provide an avenue for future improvement without risking essential infrastructure projects for the development of the region.
Therefore, in construction development in the United Kingdom, government agencies work with each other in order to appropriate actual planning permits for construction and development (Keating et al. 2009). For example, an article that was published recently in 2004 included the region to the United Kingdom in understanding the various policy differences in the promotion of renewable energy infrastructure for major cities around the world (Reiche & Bechberger 2004).
Here, the article pointed out that because of the future plans of the European Union to integrate various new technologies that promoted renewable energy, many of the infrastructure and construction projects that aim at the development and creation of electricity for the population are currently being adjusted so that future developments in green technology may be integrated into the location.
An article published as early as 1976, on the other hand, discusses how the United Kingdom differentiates between various industrial categories of the geography so that planning and development may be appropriated to the respective location without risking the mixing of construction and infrastructure projects that would be harmful when left to operate side-by-side (Keeble 1976).
Some references even indicate the importance of migration patterns into the United Kingdom for the ointment of labor of construction and infrastructure industries in which the appropriate planning departments of government allocate such migrant work in order for migration to be beneficial rather than detrimental to the region
Greenhalgh, M. , 2009. HM Colvin, J. Mordaunt Crook, K. Downes and J. Newman, The History of the King’s Works, vol. V, 1660–1782. [Gen. ed. HM Colvin. ] London: HMSO, 1976. xxiv+ 535 pp. 90 illus. + frontis. 37 figures. \pounds 25. Urban History, 6, 175–177. KAMBITES, C. & OWEN, S.
, 2006. Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK. Planning Practice and Research, 21(4), 483–496. Keating, M. , Cairney, P. & Hepburn, E. , 2009. Territorial policy communities and devolution in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. Keeble, D. , 1976. Industrial location and planning in the United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis. Mackenbach, J. P. , 2007. Sanitation: pragmatism works. British Medical Journal, 334(suppl_1), s17. Reiche, D. & Bechberger, M. , 2004. Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states. Energy Policy, 32(7), 843–849.Sample Essay of EduBirdie.com