According to most references, a community is defined as a group of people living in the same area, sharing the same interests, maintaining a specific goal or perspective, having the same belief or perspective, and so on and so forth. Usually, people come together in groups for a common interest. More often than not, these individuals come from the same geographical area, making it easy for them to convene. In this day and age, technology has been growing dramatically. Previous months’ inventions may not be the trend for the next month or two.
Computers, cell phones, the internet are just a few of the most widely used digital inventions and through which, people can communicate despite being geographically apart. Communities being mentioned have been redefined, incorporating the fact that people meet up digitally over the net. Hence, virtual communities have been emerging radically over the World Wide Web. Every social class has their corresponding community they revolve around, be it businessmen, students, workers and so many more. Almost any topic you can think of, you can find communities on the net – hobbies, work, religion, and who knows what more.
However, people meeting up over the world of internet would not be considered as a community if they only base it on their interests because this should be producing an effect in their lives as if they were physically present. Such statement is according to Paul M. Baker and Andrew C. Ward (Baker & Ward, 2002) who have both based their research from Howard Rheingold (Rheingold, 1994), the man who first introduced the concept of virtual community in 1994. But, who would have thought that from this concept will emerge different researches on how to classify which is a virtual community, and which is not?
Examined literature enables the discernment of the achievement of virtual communities by tackling some components that can be relevant to the inquiry of content, reportage, involvement, dissemination and mediation. In order to educate this method, dynamic involvement provides the complete growth and dynamism of this arena, preserving the virtual community active and splendid, with rich substance and ongoing discussions, constituting then a repository of thoughts and expanded rich concepts.
It was determined that exploration of virtual communities founded new discriminating measures of relations in academia, replacing bounded contact territoriality, yielding bigger grasp and speed to explore due to the interaction of its players, autonomous of time and distance. This comprises an extension of technological life throughout its proportions and under complete modes; however, it is one that prefers a fresh impression of distance, in that physical and virtual are reciprocally determined.
A different approach assumed by this design is of communication as the exchange between participants that share a language. Such communication can be a conventional one; that employs methods and formulas of reading and transcription of script, and an informal one; which is established on the direct and simultaneous communication between individuals who contribute various form of time and space experience. The concept of people meeting online alone can not be considered as a community. There should be something that binds them together to communicate online.
Anyone can just talk over the net and over the conversations, no matter how many people come together in one place to talk, if it ends with nothing important within the conversations, then, it is considered a non-sense talk. It does not mean as well that you all share the same interests, you then make a community. All should still be working toward a goal. Finding a way to reach that objective they set. A virtual community has all its benefits. Without being geographically present, people can find a way to somehow take part as a member. However, being a member requires commitment to the community as well.
All associates should do their own little way to somehow help the group reach their aim. Some good examples of virtual communities, which technically aren’t, are common chat rooms. There is an active participation of people who virtually gather around regularly, maybe talking about interests, hobbies and views. At the end of the day, they just remain as people who meet each other virtually. For instance, lets say they did make a group somewhere over the net, but they rarely even log-on to check on any updates or news, thus such case is definitely not to be considered a community.
It is like they built it out of formality. To “jive-in” with the crowd, to be one of them, just so they can boast that they have a group over the net. But then, do they even manage to take care of the site? Probably find a way to reach a goal they set? People, especially teens nowadays, put up groups which they try hard to get people to join along but after which, nothing else happens to the group. They just end up disappointing users, finding out that there is nothing useful to be done or one doesn’t gain anything at all with the membership.
Social networking sites are all over the net. It is the craze of youngsters, and adults alike. And through these social networking sites, groups can be created depending on certain themes, topics and technically, anything under the sun. But unfortunately, most people don’t even know the purpose of putting up those groups. It’s very seldom that people know the essence of forming them. They put them up maybe just because they felt like it. Or probably they were bored at the moment, and decided to just make it for no reason at all.Sample Essay of Edusson.com