Disney should have realized the prophetic message of the song, “It’s a small world, after all. ” Little did he or anyone else know what that phrase would truly entail just 40 years later. Globalization is the epitome of the small world concept. The concept of globalization is revolutionary to everyone involved, but no one can give a hard fast definition to the concept. The definition is plagued with bad press and over esteem with small successes. What is the real story? The ability to visualize globalization in its true form is dependent on many factors, but the majority seems to lean to the side of impairment to the world.
The general consensus is the concept of globalization is about change. This part of the definition is the only part on which everyone agrees. However, if you ask a multinational corporation or finance center you will hear that globalization is helping economies and societies around the world become more abundant and better able to care for themselves and their people. Even governments want the general population to believe that globalization will bring a social justice and strong economies around the world and societies will treat their own and others with more respect (Alfano, 2).
In truth, both of these definitions are partially right and partially wrong. Yes, the economies and societies of other countries will be affected. Yes, the social changes will also be a result of the concept of globalization. What these entities do not want John Q. Public to realize is that globalization will also destroy, contaminate, and displace millions of people, wildlife, and land without any remorse. In reality, the harmful consequences of globalization far outweigh the positive attributes (Alfano, 3).
The United States seems to be leading the way with multinational corporations and even the federal government backing corporations to expand to other countries. For example, McDonald’s is world-wide and at first seems that they are making improvements in other countries. In Japan, McDonald’s has been the reason for the bathrooms in restaurants to be clean, and in making orderly conduct in a restaurant wide spread. In Russia, many believed the employees were laughing at them until they were told that the employees were just happy to serve them.
These few sweet stories make globalization seem as harmless and that is what big corporations want the public to believe. The reality of it is that many corporations are spreading waste and environmentally debilitating trash in these other countries (Feine, 2). people are having their homes taken away and their wildlife on the border of extinction. Unfortunately, it is not only in other countries that this harming globalization is happening. Even in the United States, wildlife and people are displaced or extinct because of big business (Choike.
org). Globalization is a reality in the current and future ages of humanity, but globalization is not the problem. The problem is the consequences of over utilizing resources without a contingency plan or with any respect for the people and inhabitants. Multinational corporations and big financial centers should be ethically committed to saving the planet while growing and expanding and should figure out new ways of expansion without harming the future of the societies and communities around the world.
Alfano, Christine L. and Alyssa J. O’Brien. Envision In-depth: Reading, Writing and Researching Arguments. New Jersey: Pearson, 2007. Feine, Paul. “McBastards: McDonalds and Globalization. ” Liberty and Society Seminar. Centre of Civil Society. 26 October, 2008 http://www. ccsindia. org/ccsindia/lssreader/10lssreader. pdf. International Forum on Globalization. Globalization: Effects on Indigenous People. 26 October 2008 http://www. choike. org/documentos/chart_globaliz. pdf.Sample Essay of Edusson.com