Young Earth Creationism
Young Earth Creationism is a specific strain of creationist thought – which asserts that the universe, the Earth, life and humanity were created by a deity of supreme intelligence and power – that posits that Creation is no more than 10,000 years old. A significant number of Young Earth Creationists maintain that scientific evidence exists which supports this view, effectively suggesting that the Scriptural basis of Creationism is actually a historical and scientific record.
Young Earth Creationists maintain that the Bible is central to creationist thought and insist that the Biblical account of creation as presented in the Book of Genesis is to be read literally. This means that life, the Universe and everything came into being during a period of six solar days and that a divine intelligence/power was behind this process, and that he created man and woman and the animals and rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky, so on and so forth.
Furthermore, they note that Creationism is consistent with many worldviews, even those from other religions. Therefore the Creationist standpoint is posited as valid due to a supposed belief majority in its principles. However, this disregards the number of Judaic scholars who reject literal interpretations of the Old Testament, or the fact that the creation stories of non-Judaeo-Christian religions are recognized by their own believers to be allegories not historical or scientific fact.
By supposing that the opinions of others are consonant with their views, they seek to validate them. They are therefore engaged in an appeal to belief, argumentum ad populum, which also disregards the nuances and context from which Judaic scholars and non-Judeao-Christians subscribe to tales of Creation. In effect, Young Earth Creationists attempt to flatten the discontinuities in the beliefs from a broad range of peoples in an attempt to construct a false majority.
However, Young Earth Creationists simultaneously disregard any other scientific evidence which runs contrary to the literal reading of the Biblical creation story, declaiming it as either flawed or misinterpreted (if not outright false. ) This is an interesting quality, as many Young Earth Creationists are involved with the development of creation science, and are therefore actively engaged in attempting to reconcile creationism with scientific fact.
In effect, they are trying to locate an empirical foundation for the belief. However, by disregarding contradictory evidence such as the overwhelming scientific consensus about the universe’s age as determined by physics, the planet’s age as measured by the geologic sciences and the biological origins of contemporary species, they are engaged in giving only selective attention to evidence relevant to their claims. Regardless of whether such contradictory evidence is limited or abundant, this is a logical fallacy.
Furthermore, since Young Earth Creationists have failed to be able to categorically disprove scientific claims about the age of the universe or the age of the Earth, they seek to challenge science on the grounds that it cannot disprove the existence of God, and therefore it cannot disprove the primary agent of Creation which they posit. This is an appeal to ignorance, or argumentum ad ignorantia. They also maintain that scientists who present studies which contradict any of the principles which govern Young Earth Creationist thought must be un-Christian heathens that cannot be trusted to present an objective view of the evidence.
In a case of the pot calling the kettle black, they insist that the scientists have presented studies that are biased against Christianity, regardless of the religious denomination of the scientist being attacked. More important to such an attack is that such studies can’t be trusted and relied upon or regarded as objective evidence. They have effectively engaged in argumentum ad hominem, or personal attacks to discredit ‘opponents’ of creationism.Sample Essay of BuyEssay.org