Innovations and Challenges

The article basically provides an account of how the acquisition of ‘pure’ water is increasingly becoming more pertinent in the field of organic research where the presence of chemicals and other foreign elements may create adverse effects on the research output. Several techniques were enumerated and described, with the writer briefly stating their pros and cons. However, one rather apparent fact is that this search for pure water (pure H2O) is still far from attaining its goal. Hence, although technological advances continually develop the filtration of process, ultrapure water is still beyond science’s grasp.

Nonetheless, the research problem still remains—what procedures and techniques will be the most effective in attaining pure water? Other than this, what process of filtration will also be best to be used in water recycling, as it is deemed important in the increasing worldwide problem of water crisis? The writer first emphasized how attaining pure water is very difficult by citing the adverse effects of nuclease presence in water utilized for research. The nuclease as a universal component of organic organisms can contaminate water by the mere touch of an experimenter.

Hence, strict and rigorous must be undertaken to ensure the purity of water. The writer’s enumeration of the different filtration measures, from the use of diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC), to the use of ultraviolet technology, to ultrafiltration, gave brief but understandably incomprehensive descriptions of each procedure. The writer also briefly touched the issue on mass water recycling, especially for practical consumption, giving emphasis on its pertinence today. Conflicts of research There are some contentions that may appear however.

For instance, one aspect that the writer included is the presence of many ‘standards’ that mark the relativity of the very concept of water purity. Although these standards vary by organization, it implies that even ‘pure water’ as it is used today in contemporary life sciences research varies. An inevitable but crucial possibility may be the plurality of research outcomes. This multiplicity, of course, would not be acceptable in formulating certain research generalities. The article’s apparent emphasis on the effectiveness of ultraviolet (UV) radiation technology as used in water purification is practically disturbing.

Although methods utilizing this technology are undeniably safe, the use of more practical and accessible technology is not thoroughly given attention, thereby implying that water purification to the highest possible level is limited only to those who have sufficient funds to do so. Another would be a critique of the whole idea of scientific research utilizing pure water. Although the writer’s emphasis search for pure, laboratory-quality pure water is scientifically significant, it would be also be rather vain to elucidate these procedures for performance’ sake.

Practically, the presence of pure water will not be that important, especially in the era today where there is massive water shortage. Constant refinement of the purifying technique would be more significant if they are used in practical problems such as this. Of course, this is not to imply that there is insufficient effort towards this goal. Moreover, a rather notable contention may arise regarding the whole validity of researches involving the (ideally) use of pure water. If pure water is still not yet attained in practice, then the output of these researches are then not 100% reliable.

And consequently, this unreliability will be inevitable unless water purified to the maximum level is attained and properly utilized. Conclusion The article ‘Pure Water? ’ gives a brief account of how the search for the pure, untainted H2O or water is advancing through technological innovations. The writer emphasized, however, that despite these innovations, pure water is still a scientific sorcerer’s stone. Hence, it deems that contemporary scientific research will still not be able to attain hard-and-fast findings.

The article’s emphasis on the different research marks the apparent exclusivity of the idea of water purification. This manifested itself in the article’s mentioning of state-of-the-art technology on ultraviolet radiation, ultrafiltration, etc. Because water purification for laboratory use demands a substantial amount of money, the whole scheme is therefore a very arduous undertaking. The question of how relevant is the output of these undertakings is consequently compromised. Moreover, the article remains insufficient in elucidating the importance of water filtration to a more practical use.

This is very important since there is a general and increasing necessity for water sources. Sources Cox, Charles Raymond. 1946. Laboratory control of water purification : a handbook of laboratory practice in the water works plant, prepared particularly for the man who has not had the advantages of extended training in chemistry and bacteriology. New York : Case-Sheppard-Mann Publishing Corporation. Buie, John. 2010. “Evolution of Water Purification Systems. ” Lab Product News. July 14 2010.

Sample Essay of Edusson.com