Different dimensions
The constant debate towards population growth had divided scholars who sought to find the overall impact of such towards sustenance and future development. At the same time, it created different dimensions of interpretations coming from different fields and brought considerable attention with one objective on hand – making the Earth sustainable and fit for future inhabitants. In the end, these myriad of frameworks must collectively realize that the only way to make our planet sustainable and adaptable to changes is discovering the middle ground wherein solutions can be made to address this complex problem.
The split in perspectives concerning overpopulation has given many scholars the idea that such concept remains to be subjective and complex in nature. Many interpretations had pointed out its relative strengths and implications in the impact on both the environment and the natural resources. It is in here that both sides of the party must clearly be established so as to distinguish the necessary approach in developing a side. Looking at the side who favors that overpopulation is clearly destroying the environment; each one argues that it is a clear hindrance to sustainability and growth.
Rather than complement these ideas, excessive population growth results in the degradation of natural resources at a faster pace and at the same time increases the likelihood of pollution and waste (Keffer, 2005). Due to this, many environmentalists’ organizations are against the high ratio of birth rates compared to death rates. Another strand that sees can be deciphered in the process involves the inability of the planet and its natural resources to supplement the needs of the booming world population.
With man’s continued exhaustion of these resources, it is less difficult to obtain materials and at the same time replace them for it to be available in the future (Ascani, 2006). Due to this, inequality becomes prevalent as people begin to use power to get hold of important and basic resources. On the other hand, there are also groups who do not see overpopulation as a threat. Many see these thing as a natural occurrence of things as it is the choice and tendency of man to multiply given their individual will and freedom (Birchall, 2006).
These groups argue that people blame overpopulation as the main root of the problem while disregarding other factors that have been the cause of unequal distribution of resources. Another strand that involves and holds such claim is interest groups who focus on the welfare of women’s health. For them population control is just a method by the government to temporarily answer its inability to address the problems of continued environmental degradation (Hartman, p. 240). They use the concept of overpopulation as an excuse towards rapidly expanding exploitation and displacement of many individuals due to economic systems.
In the end, each party has their individual strengths and weaknesses. One must be careful on taking a stand for this issue remains to be complex and subjective in nature. However, to make change possible, individuals and groups must collaborate and work together not by agreeing or disagreeing that overpopulation is a threat to the environment. Rather, a consensus must be made that the current environment is rapidly changing and evolving; thus we have to make the necessary arrangements to make our world sustainable and continuously developing for the better. References Ascani, N. (2006) Is overpopulation a world threat: YES.
Retrieved January 27, 2009 from, http://www. helium. com/items/1049767-is-overpopulation-a-world-threat Birchall, D. (2006) Is Overpopulation a world threat: NO. Retrieved January 27, 2009 from, http://www. helium. com/debates/166036-is-overpopulation-a-world-threat/side_by_side? page=2 Hartmann, B. (n. d. ) Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control in Chapter 11: Population Control and Controversies. Retrieved January 27, 2009 235-241. Keffer, L. (2005) The Overpopulation Debate, Part 2: Are there solutions? Retrieved January 27, 2009 from, http://www. trueu. org/dorms/stulounge/A000000721. cfm
Sample Essay of Edusson.com