Professional Workplace Dilemma Paper - Best Essay Writing Service Reviews Reviews | Get Coupon Or Discount 2016
Free Essays All Companies All Writing Services

Professional Workplace Dilemma Paper

By the management and the staff of our institution a team work project was assigned to us the four members entitled as the Organizational Training. We were tagged as the best new students of this institution. We were given the task of making a new proposal for any company based on the current situation and economy of the country. Cathy was made the team leader and she was tasked to bring about the coordination of all the team members and to bring about the collective information into workable facets and to lead the team work with the cognition of all the members to attain a better result.

The conflict started the day when we were assigned with our task by Cathy. She had a personality trait of being a leader and a very bossy person at heart but an excellent innovative mind that was embedded with creativity and long-run profit plans. The work that she assigned to us was quite apart from our defined goals and objectives that were being told to us previously when we sat together in order to discuss about our project. The conflict initiator were the two members Sam (as in me) and Nancy who pointed the fact that if there are new thoughts in the project we should have been told before hand in order for them to be prepared.

Moreover what we noticed was quite a dilemma or ethical dilemma in broader sense: Ronald was a Christian and so was Cathy, despite unconsciously she favored him more than any of us. The work that was assigned to us was given without our consent rather Ronald was asked to manipulate the work before he was assigned with it. Cathy though being professionally balanced did not realize the repercussions and therefore disagreement took it a step forward and I took the initiative to point out the mismanagement and prejudice feelings that were taking place.

The work assignment we were given was a very delicate one and therefore a thought process or the intellectual genre of all our group members were the most important and significant in order to make it a success. The fulfillment of the project within the time in an effective and an efficient way was at stake just because of the cognitive dissonance generation due to such ethical dilemma. The initiative that I took was before 5 weeks of the deadline that was given to us by our professor Mr. Lee. I met Cathy at a meeting to tell her how I and the other member felt of the team work.

She objected most of my points which led me to report it to a higher authority. When such thing was done by me, Cathy was been called by the higher authority and was explained of the repercussions of such act. Though I could have tried to wait and could have thought over the critical thinking as thinking critically requires command of fundamental intellectual standards that could have been my objective but I reacted in haste. ( Paul& Elder, n. d. ) Cathy had understood her mistake after the meeting with the higher authority. This could have been done by me or by other member of the team.

When she came back she did not felt the same way, as the matter of her concern was flipped into disappointment as the team vision and team spirit vanquished with my complaining to the higher authority. The project was completed before time but this time we were not the best. Though there was a greater ethical dilemma that was dealt in the end of the project but the hastiness shown by me as a team member violated the intellectual standards of thinking and decision making. After 3 weeks we are given a new project again and this times a greater one.

The previous ethical dilemma taught me and the other team members that the method of talking any dilemma needs the eight standards to be fulfilled: • Relevance • Logic • Accuracy • Depth • Significance • Precision • Breadth • Fairness Thus, the next time handling a situation of this nature would be different than the previous method applied. (Paul& Elder, 2002) BIBLIOGRAPHY Critical Thinking. (n. d. ). Ethical Reasoning. Retrieved February 22, 2009 from http://www. criticalthinking. org/files/SAM-EthicalReasoning20051. pdf Paul, R. , Elder, L. (2002). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. FT Press

Sample Essay of Eduzaurus.com