Rocket Shield Debate
On the 21st of this month, Russian administration gave a press release in which they expressed their concern over the increasing interest of the new United States administration in missile defense programs. Russian authorities are beginning to express their concerns as time passes by and all the United States becomes aggressive in its perusal of its missile defense program.
There have been continued expressions of apprehension amongst the United States, European Union and other NATO countries towards the decision of the United States to increase the momentum of its discussions with the Czech Republic and Poland for the deployment of its missile defense program. The recent test launching of one of its missiles by North Korea has also served to increase the volatility of the situation (Simberg and Pike). Even though the test launch of the missile failed, apprehensions were observed to increase in energy regarding the possibility of a nuclear strike in the United States.
Russia is of the opinion that the United States is taking measures on the missile defense plan without having gone through the necessary procedures that are required to determine whether it is currently under the threat of a nuclear attack at all or not (Space War). However, statements released by representatives of the Obama administration continue to claim that the nuclear threat to the United States is indeed as real as it can be and measures are required if the United States is to stay safe from these evolving threats.
It is important to note at this point that tensions between the United States and Russia in this regard are not newfound but have been steadily aggravating since President George W. Bush’s second term. The core structure of the United States missile defense plan is to set up radar in the Czech Republic with interlinked missiles in Poland. The United States has been careful to elaborate upon the fact that the missile defense system is the United States’ chosen methodology to counter any possible attacks by rogue states so that interests in Russia are not offended.
Yet, the current Russian administration has expressed concerns that show that it has been threatened. Measures taken in this regard that are contributing towards the stabilization of the situation include statements such as those expressed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov who stated earlier that the attention that the United States is giving to Russian concerns should be seen as a positive sign in the relations between the two countries.
Speculations by diplomats on the European front have reflected high degrees of concern as well. For instance, there have been articulations of concern that have pointed out that the nature of apprehension being raised due to the rocket shield is similar to that which was raised in question of the nuclear arms during the cold war period (Mallet). Similar are the apprehensions that have been raised by NATO regarding the missile intercepting systems that the United States has been meaning to deploy since January earlier in the year.
Multilateral discussions between the concerned countries have been subjected to and have become the victim of the sensitive nature of the matter and the recommendations that the discussion is not debated upon in the alliance. In situations such as these, it is only natural to recommend that the United States, Czech Republic, European Union, Russia and the NATO alliance sit down together and carry out a multilateral debate upon the issue. However, clashing interests of power figures such as President Obama and the Russian president are elements that desperately require a solution that is out of the box and can be relied upon.
Needless to say, the deployment of the missile defense shield is an aspect that can have multiple consequences, other than the ones that it is being deployed for. It is for the same reason that the presence of an arbitrator has become vital for the deployment to carry on as scheduled with a solution that presents a win-win situation for all the nations and alliances involved (Bennett). It is necessary that the arbitrator is one that does not belong to either the European Union and is in no way under any heavy obligations to the United States.
The arbitrator must be one who is not influenced by the deployment of the missile since the presence of this aspect may influence the mediation that the arbitrator will be meant to perform. Although the nations and alliances in question are ones who have come a long way together and have matured significantly in their political relationships, a project of a nature as sensitive as that of the missile defense program requires that the maturity in relationship is utilized to bring about a productive conclusion to the rocket shield debate. Works Cited Bennett, Steven C.
Arbitration: essential concepts. ALM Publishing, 2002. Mallet, Pascal. US Missile Plans Accelerate Defence Shield Debate At NATO. 15 March 2007. 23 April 2009 <http://www. spacewar. com/reports/US_Missile_Plans_Accelerate_Defence_Shield_Debate_At_NATO_999. html>. Simberg, Rand and John Pike. How Hard Is It to Fire a Rocket? 7 April 2009. 22 April 2009 <http://roomfordebate. blogs. nytimes. com/2009/04/07/how-hard-is-it-to-fire-a-rocket/>. Space War. Russia accuses US on missile shield. 21 April 2009. 22 April 2009 <http://www. spacewar. com/reports/Russia_accuses_US_on_missile_shield_999. html>.Sample Essay of BuyEssay.org